Author: Bjørn Lovén
 |
Fig. 1 Area 1, the upper ends of shipsheds
1, η and parts of χ are preserved in the basement
apartment block (Sirangiou 1) in the background. This photograph
was taken during the excavation of the colonnade that divides
shipsheds 1 and η.
Photographer: Bjørn Lovén/© ZHP 2003 |
| |
 |
Fig. 2 Mads Moeller Nielsen excavating
the colonnade that divides shipsheds 1 and η. He is dictating
his excavation notes to Mette K. Schaldemose via an underwater
communication system. Ioannis Triantafillidis is responsible
for the machinery supporting the dive, and is present also
for safety reasons.
Photographer: Bjørn Lovén/© ZHP 2003 |
| |
 |
Fig. 3 The colonnade dividing shipsheds
1 and η, the southern part of the first rock-cut foundation
trench for a column base. Visible to the left is a part of
the raised side-passage, the working area of the hauling crew.
Photographer: Bjørn Lovén/© ZHP 2003 |
| |
 |
Fig. 4 Mads Moeller Nielsen working inside
the Enclosure System during a nine hour long dive in the worst
possible diving conditions.
Photographer: Bjørn Lovén/© ZHP 2003 |
The main objective of the 2003 campaign was to complete the excavation
of the submerged lower part of shipshed η located in the eastern
part of the harbour basin in front of Odos Sirangiou 1 (fig. 1).
In addition parts of shipshed χ were cleaned. The survey of the
eastern and south eastern part of the Zea Harbour basin was continued.
In Area 2 we discovered two shipsheds built on top of each other.
The investigations were carried out in cooperation with the Ephorate
of Underwater Antiquities, and the following report summarizes the
results of our fieldwork carried out in 2003:
The excavation of shipshed η was completed for now, since, to
our regret, the lower end of this building has been destroyed by a
combination of erosion and intrusive dredging carried out when the
marina was constructed in the 1960'ies. The dredging cut runs through
the colonnade dividing shipsheds 1 and η, the northern side-passage,
and continues through the northern part of η’'s ramp structure.
From this point the cut appears to be less deep, and it continues
through the ramp and the southern side passage. A condition assessment
of the area west (to the seaside) of the cut determined that this
area is severely damaged and we decided not to excavate this area
in order not to compromise possible remains of the building.
The colonnade dividing shipsheds 1 and η was excavated for 10.5
m from the modern quay to the dredging cut (fig. 2). The
excavation revealed three rock-cut column base foundation cuttings,
so well preserved that the chisel marks from their construction were
still visible (fig. 3). The column bases are not preserved,
but in the western-most foundation trench rock fragments with chisel
marks were found in what may be remains of the original fill. These
rock fragments are probably from the construction of the shipsheds,
if so, the tool marks will provide information on the tools used for
carving the rock-cut parts of the buildings.
Two rock-cut foundation trenches for column bases in the colonnade
dividing shipsheds η and χ were excavated. After careful
surface cleaning to the west of the western-most foundation cutting,
it became obvious that the bedrock in this area is crumbling and large
pieces are flaking off. It was decided not to excavate this area until
a method of consolidating the bedrock has been developed. Towards
the end of the project period cleaning of the colonnade area dividing
shipsheds χ and φ revealed a foundation trench close to
the dredging cut with the column base (or column base foundation block)
still in situ. We experienced extremely bad visibility during this
part of the excavation, and it would not have been possible to work
without the Mark II version of the Enclosure System (fig. 4).
The excavated areas were backfilled with sand to protect the exposed
structures.
The submerged column bases (or column base foundation blocks) and
column base foundation cuttings in the four colonnades dividing shipsheds
1/η,η/χ, χ/φ and φ/π are parallel
to each other. The colonnades line up perfectly with the remains of
the colonnades preserved in the basement and on the pavement of Sirangiou
1.
The colonnades change at some point from the alternating 2.16-2.18
m and 3.38-3.39 m inter axial spacing (the distance from column centre
to column centre in a colonnade) in the upper end of the shipsheds
to a parallel architectural layout in the lower end of the shipsheds.
This is a strong structural indication of two building phases in shipsheds
1, η, χ and φ, and the superstructure of these shipsheds
underwent major rebuilding, but the chronology of the building phases
has not yet been established. On the basis of structural evidence
an earlier building phase was also recognized in the submerged part
of shipshed χ’s ramp.
Several remains of roof-tiles similar to those found in the deposit
in the basement of Sirangiou 1 in 2002 were excavated in shipshed
η, and their distribution indicates that they belong to the roof
of the shipsheds.
During the underwater survey in Area 1 and 2 we found evidence which
strongly indicates that the ramps were longer than anticipated in
the past. In Area 2 we located a shipshed that would be 53.5 m long
if the back wall of the Sirangiou shipsheds is extended into this
area. The ramp of shipshed 1 appears to be about 52.5 m measured to
the back wall, which is why we wish to survey and excavate the lower
end of this shipshed in 2004. Previously we thought that the ramps
were 50.50 m, but cleaning of the lower part of shipshed χ, on
which the 50.50 m measurement was based, determined that the lower
end of this shipshed had suffered considerable destruction and that
it in all probability is not preserved to its original length.
In Area 2 we discovered two shipsheds built on top of each other.
The buildings have different orientations, and apart from the two
different phases of shipsheds, the architectural structures also show
that this section of the shipshed complex changed orientation at some
point in time. We assume that the first building phase belongs to
the 5th century BC, and the second building phase to the 4th century
BC, but further investigation is needed to determine the chronology
of the building phases, which is why we plan to excavate these shipsheds
in October - November 2004.
Before the investigations of the Zea Harbour Project we had only the
historical late 330’s BC date of the Zea shipsheds. The investigations
this year clearly show that there are more building phases in the
Zea shipsheds, and one of our most important research aims is that
we will be able to present a more complete chronological picture of
the Zea harbour through the centuries in which it was in use as a
naval harbour. _____________
2003 field team: Mette K. Schaldemose, Sigrid Rasdal Eliassen,
Evangelia Fragou, Annie Hooton, Charles Pochin, Richard C. Anderson,
Ioannis Triantafillidis, Mads Møller Nielsen and Bjørn
Lovén. Information Technology team: Rebekka Carlson,
Mikkel Mayerhofer and Jeppe Christensen. |